<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimization II: Why it was Relegated to the Shadows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/08/26/optimization-ii-why-it-was-relegated-to-the-shadows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/08/26/optimization-ii-why-it-was-relegated-to-the-shadows/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/08/26/optimization-ii-why-it-was-relegated-to-the-shadows/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=239#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>This is indeed a very insightful look at why optimization, which without doubt is clearly the logical way to extract savings out of your sourcing events, didn't take-off. While Supply Chain Planning products are successful because of their optimization prowress; it seems the Sourcing world has a long way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed a very insightful look at why optimization, which without doubt is clearly the logical way to extract savings out of your sourcing events, didn&#8217;t take-off. While Supply Chain Planning products are successful because of their optimization prowress; it seems the Sourcing world has a long way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
