<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Billions Be Saved By Best Practices And Supporting Technology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/07/could-billions-be-saved-by-best-practices-and-supporting-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/07/could-billions-be-saved-by-best-practices-and-supporting-technology/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Strovink</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/07/could-billions-be-saved-by-best-practices-and-supporting-technology/#comment-4031</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Strovink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=327#comment-4031</guid>
		<description>The key point is this:  If current procurement processes are labor-intensive, and they cannot be changed, then moving those processes to a venue where labor costs are lower will save money -- so long as there are no disruptions or problems caused by the dislocation.  If, on the other hand, the focus changes to re-engineering procurement processes intelligently -- using e-sourcing and e-procurement tools effectively, for example, and/or using BPM tools to systematize previously ad-hoc activities -- then the savings opportunity may be much greater.

The winners of the procurement process insourcing/outsourcing race will be those companies and BPO vendors who become best-in-class at injecting value and intelligence into the process.   If tying a shoe is necessary, then tying a shoe less expensively will certainly save money; but avoiding tying the shoe in the first place wins the prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key point is this:  If current procurement processes are labor-intensive, and they cannot be changed, then moving those processes to a venue where labor costs are lower will save money &#8212; so long as there are no disruptions or problems caused by the dislocation.  If, on the other hand, the focus changes to re-engineering procurement processes intelligently &#8212; using e-sourcing and e-procurement tools effectively, for example, and/or using BPM tools to systematize previously ad-hoc activities &#8212; then the savings opportunity may be much greater.</p>
<p>The winners of the procurement process insourcing/outsourcing race will be those companies and BPO vendors who become best-in-class at injecting value and intelligence into the process.   If tying a shoe is necessary, then tying a shoe less expensively will certainly save money; but avoiding tying the shoe in the first place wins the prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
