<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 - The e-Sourcing Crystal Ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/26/2007-the-e-sourcing-crystal-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/26/2007-the-e-sourcing-crystal-ball/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/26/2007-the-e-sourcing-crystal-ball/#comment-7852</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=334#comment-7852</guid>
		<description>Your crystal ball seems to have at least 1 slam dunk guarantee in line for 2007
&lt;a href="http://www.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your crystal ball seems to have at least 1 slam dunk guarantee in line for 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">Yahoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Brainer</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/26/2007-the-e-sourcing-crystal-ball/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>No Brainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=334#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>David,

Your crystal ball seems to have at least 1 slam dunk guarantee in line for 2007. Looking at the amount of turnover Verticalnets mgt team has seen in the past 2 months you have to imagine they are moving closer to being acquired IBM, CDC, or tbd...something is brewing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Your crystal ball seems to have at least 1 slam dunk guarantee in line for 2007. Looking at the amount of turnover Verticalnets mgt team has seen in the past 2 months you have to imagine they are moving closer to being acquired IBM, CDC, or tbd&#8230;something is brewing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supply Excellence &#187; Kicking and Screaming: My Top Picks for 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2006/12/26/2007-the-e-sourcing-crystal-ball/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Supply Excellence &#187; Kicking and Screaming: My Top Picks for 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=334#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m embarassed to say he coaxed me using the road-tested &#8220;everyone-is-doing-it&#8221; tactic. Though sophomoric, it&#8217;s still a pretty persuasive technique. (How else do you think all those e-marketplaces got funded?) In fact, Spend Matters, Sourcing Innovation, The Purchasing Certification Blog, and (even) the e-Sourcing Forum all beat me to the punch, having already posted some interesting predictions. That doesn&#8217;t mean that I agree with their forecasts. (No offense Michael, but will 2007 really be the year of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)? During my decade as analyst, I was always amused by my peer&#8217;s annual prediction that this will be PLM&#8217;s breakout year.) But their predictions are more than worth the read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m embarassed to say he coaxed me using the road-tested &#8220;everyone-is-doing-it&#8221; tactic. Though sophomoric, it&#8217;s still a pretty persuasive technique. (How else do you think all those e-marketplaces got funded?) In fact, Spend Matters, Sourcing Innovation, The Purchasing Certification Blog, and (even) the e-Sourcing Forum all beat me to the punch, having already posted some interesting predictions. That doesn&#8217;t mean that I agree with their forecasts. (No offense Michael, but will 2007 really be the year of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)? During my decade as analyst, I was always amused by my peer&#8217;s annual prediction that this will be PLM&#8217;s breakout year.) But their predictions are more than worth the read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
