<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going green the Wal-Mart way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/01/23/going-green-the-wal-mart-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/01/23/going-green-the-wal-mart-way/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta name="generator" content="Obscure 2.0" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rotor</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/01/23/going-green-the-wal-mart-way/comment-page-1/#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rotor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=352#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>David,

I agree that the days are long gone that environmental purchasing means subsidizes.  I worked on a project for a national retailer back in 2003/4 that has over 3,000 stores in North America.  The biggest savings we generated came from a similar project to the Walmart recycling you mention.  In their case we advised them to invest $6M into OCC (cardboard) crusher/balers into each of their Regional Distrubtion Centers. We then used the &quot;dead head&quot; capacity in their trucks that delivered clothes to the stores to bring OCC back to the DC&#039;s.  Back then we weren&#039;t thinking carbon loads but, including strategic sourcing savings from moving from 100&#039;s of garbage haulers to 7, we reduced their waste removal budget from a $12M cost to a $3M profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I agree that the days are long gone that environmental purchasing means subsidizes.  I worked on a project for a national retailer back in 2003/4 that has over 3,000 stores in North America.  The biggest savings we generated came from a similar project to the Walmart recycling you mention.  In their case we advised them to invest $6M into OCC (cardboard) crusher/balers into each of their Regional Distrubtion Centers. We then used the &#8220;dead head&#8221; capacity in their trucks that delivered clothes to the stores to bring OCC back to the DC&#8217;s.  Back then we weren&#8217;t thinking carbon loads but, including strategic sourcing savings from moving from 100&#8242;s of garbage haulers to 7, we reduced their waste removal budget from a $12M cost to a $3M profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

