<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No pain, no gain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/01/26/no-pain-no-gain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/01/26/no-pain-no-gain/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Supply Chain strategies for 2007 - Strategic Sourcing &#124; Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/01/26/no-pain-no-gain/#comment-4347</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Supply Chain strategies for 2007 - Strategic Sourcing &#124; Europe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=367#comment-4347</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to David Bush and his post no pain, no gain&#8230;not really, I&#8217;ve discovered a GREAT top 10 report issued by SupplyChainDigest: The Top 10 Supply Chain and Logistics Technologies and Strategies for 2007: &#8220;Published in 2007, this is the first annual list of the top supply chain and logistics technologies and strategies for the coming year. The list, from number 1 to number 10, was based primarily on an assessment of the relative “pain to gain” ratios that most companies seem to experience when pursuing each category.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to David Bush and his post no pain, no gain&#8230;not really, I&#8217;ve discovered a GREAT top 10 report issued by SupplyChainDigest: The Top 10 Supply Chain and Logistics Technologies and Strategies for 2007: &#8220;Published in 2007, this is the first annual list of the top supply chain and logistics technologies and strategies for the coming year. The list, from number 1 to number 10, was based primarily on an assessment of the relative “pain to gain” ratios that most companies seem to experience when pursuing each category.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
