<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Issues in eSourcing: Adoption and Penetration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/01/issues-in-esourcing-adoption-and-penetration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/01/issues-in-esourcing-adoption-and-penetration/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lamoureux</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/01/issues-in-esourcing-adoption-and-penetration/#comment-7766</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lamoureux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=434#comment-7766</guid>
		<description>A complete list of all guest posts to-date are found in this post on sourcing innovation:
http://blog.sourcinginnovation.com/2007/05/13/the-top-three-xii-summary.aspx

Every guest blogger was a practitioner in some way - consultant, executive, or practitioner in the space. 

The point of this series was to explore issues, not academic solution models, so, no, a discusssion of the academic frameworks you mentioned was not present in any of the posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A complete list of all guest posts to-date are found in this post on sourcing innovation:<br />
<a href="http://blog.sourcinginnovation.com/2007/05/13/the-top-three-xii-summary.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sourcinginnovation.com/2007/05/13/the-top-three-xii-summary.aspx</a></p>
<p>Every guest blogger was a practitioner in some way - consultant, executive, or practitioner in the space. </p>
<p>The point of this series was to explore issues, not academic solution models, so, no, a discusssion of the academic frameworks you mentioned was not present in any of the posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filip Verboven</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/01/issues-in-esourcing-adoption-and-penetration/#comment-7765</link>
		<dc:creator>Filip Verboven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=434#comment-7765</guid>
		<description>Did any have a more academic viewpoint on this topic based on 
-	Theory of Reasoned Action
-	Theory of Planned Behaviour
-	Technology Acceptance Model
-	Diffusion of Innovations
-	Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

In the viewpoint of an AMB project I am checking if these model could be applied and under which format can buyers we influenced towards better adoption of this concept in their purchasing toolkit.... any suggestion is welcome....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did any have a more academic viewpoint on this topic based on<br />
-	Theory of Reasoned Action<br />
-	Theory of Planned Behaviour<br />
-	Technology Acceptance Model<br />
-	Diffusion of Innovations<br />
-	Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology</p>
<p>In the viewpoint of an AMB project I am checking if these model could be applied and under which format can buyers we influenced towards better adoption of this concept in their purchasing toolkit&#8230;. any suggestion is welcome&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
