<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware of China Sourcing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: E-Sourcing Forum: the source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/#comment-7851</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Sourcing Forum: the source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=466#comment-7851</guid>
		<description>[...] The last few months, I have had a number of posts on both sides of the LCCS issue, like this one on China Sourcing. TCS (The Cynical Sourcer) sent me these links about sourcing from Vietnam by &#8220;&#62;SupplyChainDigest regarding that country&#8217;s emergence on the global sourcing front. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last few months, I have had a number of posts on both sides of the LCCS issue, like this one on China Sourcing. TCS (The Cynical Sourcer) sent me these links about sourcing from Vietnam by &#8220;&gt;SupplyChainDigest regarding that country&#8217;s emergence on the global sourcing front. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/#comment-7806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=466#comment-7806</guid>
		<description>I have seen this general analysis a number of times. Perhaps analysis of the issues associated with differing levels of granularity would be of interest to others beside myself. Componets vs. finished goods, high obsolescence risk vs low risk, low value goods vs high value, high material cost vs high labor cost goods, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen this general analysis a number of times. Perhaps analysis of the issues associated with differing levels of granularity would be of interest to others beside myself. Componets vs. finished goods, high obsolescence risk vs low risk, low value goods vs high value, high material cost vs high labor cost goods, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eunice Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/#comment-7800</link>
		<dc:creator>Eunice Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=466#comment-7800</guid>
		<description>It is absolutely true about hidden costs and other issues when sourcing in China. It is always some sweeping statements made that " getting things from China is very cheap" without knowing the true picture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is absolutely true about hidden costs and other issues when sourcing in China. It is always some sweeping statements made that &#8221; getting things from China is very cheap&#8221; without knowing the true picture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bush - Iasta</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/#comment-7798</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bush - Iasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=466#comment-7798</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, additional information and compliment, Adam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, additional information and compliment, Adam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam J Fein</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/05/29/beware-of-china-sourcing/#comment-7797</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam J Fein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=466#comment-7797</guid>
		<description>Very good points.

Supply Chain Management Review published a similar article in April called "Revisiting LCCS in a Demand-Driven World."  I wrote a summary on my blog:

&lt;a href='http://www.distributiontrends.com/2007/05/near-shoring-private-labels.html' rel="nofollow"&gt; Near-Shoring Private Labels&lt;/a&gt;

BTW, I really enjoy reading your blog.

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points.</p>
<p>Supply Chain Management Review published a similar article in April called &#8220;Revisiting LCCS in a Demand-Driven World.&#8221;  I wrote a summary on my blog:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.distributiontrends.com/2007/05/near-shoring-private-labels.html' rel="nofollow"> Near-Shoring Private Labels</a></p>
<p>BTW, I really enjoy reading your blog.</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
