<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Supply Chain a Priority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/09/13/making-supply-chain-a-priority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/09/13/making-supply-chain-a-priority/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:16:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam J. Fein</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/09/13/making-supply-chain-a-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-8141</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam J. Fein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/09/13/making-supply-chain-a-priority/#comment-8141</guid>
		<description>Thanks for highlighting my quote!

I posted some additional thoughts on counterfeits in the downstream supply chain (aka distribution channel) in health care products here:

http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/08/diversion-from-canada-via-china.html

BTW, I&#039;m still optimistic about Chinese sourcing, as a July post on my other blog shows:
http://www.distributiontrends.com/2007/07/risks-of-chinese-sourcing.html

Regards,
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for highlighting my quote!</p>
<p>I posted some additional thoughts on counterfeits in the downstream supply chain (aka distribution channel) in health care products here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/08/diversion-from-canada-via-china.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/08/diversion-from-canada-via-china.html</a></p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m still optimistic about Chinese sourcing, as a July post on my other blog shows:<br />
<a href="http://www.distributiontrends.com/2007/07/risks-of-chinese-sourcing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.distributiontrends.com/2007/07/risks-of-chinese-sourcing.html</a></p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehsan Ehsani</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/09/13/making-supply-chain-a-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-8140</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehsan Ehsani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2007/09/13/making-supply-chain-a-priority/#comment-8140</guid>
		<description>Well, the interesting issue is that it seems senior management is aware of supply chain risks in Asia or other low cost regions. A study done by Marsh Consulting (I have covered this www.supplychainer.com) has found out that management ranks quality as the second most important risk category, but why they don&#039;t take serious actions is a big question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the interesting issue is that it seems senior management is aware of supply chain risks in Asia or other low cost regions. A study done by Marsh Consulting (I have covered this <a href="http://www.supplychainer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.supplychainer.com</a>) has found out that management ranks quality as the second most important risk category, but why they don&#8217;t take serious actions is a big question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
