<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another vote for SaaS</title>
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2008/03/04/another-vote-for-saas/</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Strovink</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2008/03/04/another-vote-for-saas/#comment-11184</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Strovink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2008/03/04/another-vote-for-saas/#comment-11184</guid>
		<description>1) SaaS works when applications follow the forms-based CICS model -- i.e., the apps are thin client apps that require minimal intelligence and processing on the front end.  Many applications fall into this category, but many do not; either that, or they sacrifice lots of functionality and performance in order to become thin client.
2) So, a distinction needs to be made between thin client and pay-as-you-go.  I'm a strong advocate of pay-as-you-go, but BIQ couldn't offer half the functionality that it does if it were a thin-client web app.  We're pay-as-you-go, but we're not thin client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) SaaS works when applications follow the forms-based CICS model &#8212; i.e., the apps are thin client apps that require minimal intelligence and processing on the front end.  Many applications fall into this category, but many do not; either that, or they sacrifice lots of functionality and performance in order to become thin client.<br />
2) So, a distinction needs to be made between thin client and pay-as-you-go.  I&#8217;m a strong advocate of pay-as-you-go, but BIQ couldn&#8217;t offer half the functionality that it does if it were a thin-client web app.  We&#8217;re pay-as-you-go, but we&#8217;re not thin client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Buxton</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2008/03/04/another-vote-for-saas/#comment-11183</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2008/03/04/another-vote-for-saas/#comment-11183</guid>
		<description>Good posting. SaaS is a bit of a no-brainer. And ref Ariba/Procuri, Jason mentioned yesterday that Ariba have  "bet the entire company on an on-demand transformation that includes software, services and information". 

http://www.spendmatters.com/index.cfm/2008/3/3/Aribas-Unleashes-9S5-Plays-Up-OnDemand-in-a-Major-Way

Ariba, to be fair, are probably in a bit of a tricky situation. They have a legacy installed base of companies who bought the software in order to have their own system installed on their own servers. How these customers will react to such a focus on SaaS is not clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good posting. SaaS is a bit of a no-brainer. And ref Ariba/Procuri, Jason mentioned yesterday that Ariba have  &#8220;bet the entire company on an on-demand transformation that includes software, services and information&#8221;. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.spendmatters.com/index.cfm/2008/3/3/Aribas-Unleashes-9S5-Plays-Up-OnDemand-in-a-Major-Way" rel="nofollow">http://www.spendmatters.com/index.cfm/2008/3/3/Aribas-Unleashes-9S5-Plays-Up-OnDemand-in-a-Major-Way</a></p>
<p>Ariba, to be fair, are probably in a bit of a tricky situation. They have a legacy installed base of companies who bought the software in order to have their own system installed on their own servers. How these customers will react to such a focus on SaaS is not clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
