Poor Communication = Poor Supplier Performance, Part VII

September 28th, 2009 at 10:02am Charles Dominick, SPSM - Next Level Purchasing

In this penultimate post of this eight-part series, I’m going to help you understand the subtleties of using escalation clauses.

Wait.  There’s a problem already.

Do you know what it is?

Well, think about the term “escalation clause.”  What does that imply?

That there is only one way for a price to go:  up.

And, as we saw in late 2008, prices for many commodities can go down.  Way down.

The last thing you’d want is for your supplier to say after you approach them for what you thought was a contractually guaranteed price reduction would be “But the contract has an escalation clause.  It’s clear from that terminology that the intent was to only adjust the price upward.”

So some people use the term “escalation/de-escalation clause” or “price adjustment clause” to avoid such situations.  Hey, any way that you can prevent a possible dispute is a good thing.

Now, what might a price adjustment clause communicate?

It may communicate that “The price for paper on October 1, 2008 is $40.00/box.  The price will be adjusted on October 1, 2009.  The price will increase or decrease by the same percentage (rounded to one decimal point, example: 1.1%) that the Producers Price Index for ‘Writing and Printing Papers’ Series ID WPU091301 increased or decreased during the period from July 2008 to July 2009.”

What is the new price?

I always ask my seminar attendees this type of question and give them the applicable Producer’s Price Index table.  About 5% of the attendees get it right.

Then, I give them a formula.  About 12% of them get it right.

And when it has come time for suppliers to calculate their new price, I’ve seen them get it wrong, too.

This is a problem.  When you are accepting bids, it is important for every supplier to base its price on the price adjustment formula and how they expect it to change their price in the future.

Doing so ensures against the possibility that one supplier can come in with a low bid, win your business, arbitrarily adjust its price in a year, and then end up being a worse deal than if you selected another supplier.  Using a price adjustment clause while bidding ensures that all suppliers are on a level playing field for your sake and theirs.

In the next post – the last one of this series – I’ll give you some tips for ensuring that your price adjustment clause is understood and adhered to by your suppliers.

Entry Filed under: General, Supplier Performance, Suppliers, Supply Management Best Practices

Leave a Comment

hidden

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



The e-Sourcing Handbook

The e-Sourcing Handbook is a modern guide to supply and spend management success.

New Supply Chain Agenda: The 5 Steps That Drive Real Value

Turn your supply chain into a competitive weapon that produces unprecedented economic profit for your firm.
RSS   Twitter

Affiliates

Paladin Associates
TPI
Disanto and Associates
eSourcing Wiki
EnglishFrancaisDeutschItalianoEspanolPortugeseJapanese
KoreanChineseArabicRussianFinnishPolishSwedish

Certifications

Next Level Purchasing

CURRENT VIEWERS

2010 SDC Executive Pros To Know

2008 Pros To Know

2009 Pros To Know

2007 Pros To Know

2005 Pros To Know

2009 SDC Executive 100

2008 SDC Executive 100

2007 SDC Executive 100

2006 SDC Executive 100

2005 SDC Executive 100

2004 SDC Executive 100