Poor Communication = Poor Supplier Performance, Part VIII

October 12th, 2009 at 09:19am Charles Dominick, SPSM - Next Level Purchasing

In the last post, I described how price adjustment clauses are commonly misunderstood and end up causing pricing problems between buyers and suppliers.

So, what can you do to ensure that price adjustment provisions are adhered to when math isn’t everyone’s strongest skill (especially suppliers)?

Here are some tips:

  • Write out the price adjustment method in words in your RFP and contract
  • Include a formula in your RFP and contract
  • Demonstrate the calculation of a new price at a pre-bid meeting
  • Have a specific date for the adjustment
  • Sometimes index values are revised.  So be sure to state that the price is adjusted on your specified date and will not be revised, even if the index is revised later.

One more tip…YOU tell the supplier what the price is, not the other way around.

Yes, we often lean on our suppliers to do certain things that we could do.  After all, they are getting paid, right?

Well, some things you should do yourself.  Calculating new prices is one of them.

Look, you’re going to have to do the calculation anyway to verify that the supplier got it right.  And we’ve established that many professionals – even those with high levels of intellectual horsepower – suck at math.

So, don’t leave your pricing to chance.  You tell your supplier what your new pricing is.

Well, that wraps it up for this series.  I hope that you’ve learned some techniques for ensuring better communication with your suppliers for better supplier performance.

I know that if you apply everything I’ve covered, you will have fewer supplier problems and will minimize your chance of getting your industry’s equivalent of dog food delivered to you.

Good luck!

Entry Filed under: General, Supplier Performance, Suppliers, Supply Management Best Practices

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Barb Ardell  |  October 13th, 2009 at 7:44 am

    Excellent advice, Charles! The only thing I’d add is a suggestion that buyers include an example in the contract. That way, both parties can just plug in the new numbers and reach the same result. Finally, I am amazed to encounter situations where the buyer not only relies on the supplier to provide the new prices but then doesn’t verify them. There is absolutely no excuse for this!

  • 2. Pam  |  October 13th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    “And we’ve established that many professionals – even those with high levels of intellectual horsepower – suck at math.”

    LOL

  • 3. kurt  |  October 14th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    Great article I’ve learned several terms and new strategies.

Leave a Comment

hidden

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



The e-Sourcing Handbook

The e-Sourcing Handbook is a modern guide to supply and spend management success.

New Supply Chain Agenda: The 5 Steps That Drive Real Value

Turn your supply chain into a competitive weapon that produces unprecedented economic profit for your firm.
RSS   Twitter

Affiliates

Paladin Associates
TPI
Disanto and Associates
eSourcing Wiki
EnglishFrancaisDeutschItalianoEspanolPortugeseJapanese
KoreanChineseArabicRussianFinnishPolishSwedish

Certifications

Next Level Purchasing

CURRENT VIEWERS

2010 SDC Executive Pros To Know

2008 Pros To Know

2009 Pros To Know

2007 Pros To Know

2005 Pros To Know

2009 SDC Executive 100

2008 SDC Executive 100

2007 SDC Executive 100

2006 SDC Executive 100

2005 SDC Executive 100

2004 SDC Executive 100