<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E-Sourcing Forum &#187; Contract ManagementE-Sourcing Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/category/functionality/contract-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com</link>
	<description>The source of information and best practices in strategic sourcing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta name="generator" content="Obscure 2.0" />
		<item>
		<title>Trends in Standardizing Contract Language</title>
		<link>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2011/05/11/trends-in-standardizing-contract-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2011/05/11/trends-in-standardizing-contract-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jami Parent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standardization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esourcingforum.com/?p=77357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iasta has been long at work researching trends and best practices in contract authoring because we’ve received a lot of requests to provide authoring to go along with SmartContracts®, our contract management software.  The first obstacle we uncovered seemed to be an almost universal challenge: standardizing contract language.  Many companies, regardless of size or industry, struggle to implement standard, approved language in all their contracts. The inclusion of non-standard language is a primary reason for contract rejection during the contract &#8230; <a href="http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2011/05/11/trends-in-standardizing-contract-language/">More <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esourcingforum.com/archives/2011/05/11/trends-in-standardizing-contract-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

